Call Us +1 224-415-2491

Tag: CFO

  • How One Company Used KPIs to Reduce & Prevent Burnout

    How One Company Used KPIs to Reduce & Prevent Burnout

    •

    Christy Suerth, MS, SPHR, CPC, CHC

    Most organizations track employee engagement. Fewer ask: What’s driving disengagement in the first place? Spoiler alert: It is burnou

    If you’re a senior leader or HR executive, you’ve seen engagement scores that fluctuate without clear cause. You’ve launched initiatives, celebrated wins, and burnout still creeps in. That’s because engagement surveys often measure outcomes, not root causes.

    At one company, a mid-sized software company with 500 employees, HR leaders faced this exact dilemma. Engagement scores were decent, but turnover was rising, and exit interviews kept pointing to burnout. So, they tried something different.

    The Six Areas That Changed Everything

    This company adopted Maslach’s Six Areas of Worklife, a research-backed framework that identifies six key dimensions shaping the employee experience:

    1. Workload – Is the volume of work sustainable?
    2. Control – Do employees have autonomy?
    3. Reward – Are contributions recognized?
    4. Community – Is there trust and support?
    5. Fairness – Are decisions equitable?
    6. Values – Do personal and organizational values align?

    These areas were measured using a short quarterly survey and tracked in a leadership dashboard.

    From Theory to Action: The KPI Dashboard

    The HR team built a dashboard that translated each area into a leadership KPI. Here’s a snapshot:

    AreaKPI ExampleLeadership Action
    WorkloadAvg. weekly hours per teamRebalanced project timelines
    Control% employees with decision authorityDelegated sprint planning to teams
    RewardRecognition frequencyLaunched peer-to-peer kudos platform
    CommunityTeam trust scoreIntroduced monthly “team health” check-ins
    FairnessPolicy equity perceptionAudited promotion criteria
    ValuesValues alignment indexConnected work to company mission in town halls

    Within two quarters, they saw a 22% drop in voluntary turnover and a 30% increase in internal mobility. Engagement scores rose, but more importantly, leaders knew why.

    Cost-Benefit: Why It Pays Off

    Cost:

    • Survey setup (internal or via external platforms)
    • Time investment for leaders to review and act on results

    Benefits:

    • Early detection of burnout before performance dips
    • Reduced attrition – Burnout is a leading cause of exit
    • Improved engagement through targeted action
    • Leadership accountability via measurable KPIs
    • Culture transformation – From reactive to proactive

    In summary, they stopped guessing and started diagnosing.

    Why Not Just Use Engagement Surveys?

    Engagement surveys are valuable, but they’re lagging indicators. They tell you what employees feel, not why.

    For example:

    • Engagement score drops → You ask: “What happened?”
    • The Areas of Work Life Survey results show workload and fairness issues → You know exactly what to fix

    Think of Maslach’s framework as the diagnostic tool, and engagement scores as the vital signs. You need both, but only one tells you where to operate.

    Final Thought

    Burnout hits your bottom line. If you’re serious about building a resilient, high-performing culture, it’s time to evolve your metrics. Maslach’s Six Areas of Worklife offer a practical, evidence-based way to turn leadership into a measurable force for good.

    Don’t just measure engagement. Engineer it.

    Sign up for my weekly newsletter.

  • Burnout Doesn’t Send You an Invoice but It’s Already Draining Your Bottom Line

    Burnout Doesn’t Send You an Invoice but It’s Already Draining Your Bottom Line

    •

    Christy Suerth, MS, SPHR, CPC, CHC

    The 5 Hidden Costs of Ignoring Burnout (and Why It’s Hitting Your P&L)

    Most leaders don’t see burnout until it’s too late. It’s only when a key team member resigns, performance drops, engagement surveys decline, or healthcare costs quietly balloon we ask questions.

    But here’s the truth: Burnout isn’t just a human problem; it’s a business problem. And ignoring it is expensive.

    Here are five hidden costs I see HR leaders and executives miss most often. These are costs that show up directly on your P&L.

    1. Lost Productivity and Presenteeism

    An employee may still be at their desk but mentally checked out. This “presenteeism” costs companies 10x more than absenteeism.

    Example: If a $100K employee is functioning at 60%, you’re losing $40K per year on just one person. Multiply that across a team, and the impact is staggering.

    2. Turnover and Replacement Costs

    When burned-out employees leave, the financial hit is steep.

    • Replacing a mid-level employee: 1.5–2x salary
    • Replacing a leader: up to 400% of salary

    Example: If a $150K leader walks out due to burnout, your organization could be absorbing a $600K loss between recruitment, training, lost opportunity and lost knowledge.

    3. Declining Engagement and Innovation

    Burnout crushes creativity. Teams stop asking, “What’s possible?” and instead focus only on survival.

    Example: That’s the million-dollar idea that never gets voiced in the meeting or the process improvement that could have saved your company six figures annually.

    4. Employer Brand Damage

    Glassdoor reviews. LinkedIn posts. Whisper networks. A reputation for burnout spreads quickl

    Example: If your culture is seen as “toxic,” top talent won’t even apply, forcing you into higher recruiting spend or settling for less-than-ideal hires.

    5. Rising Healthcare and Disability Claims

    Burnout shows up in medical bills. Stress-related illnesses drive up premiums and long-term disability costs.

    Example: A 2023 Gallup study estimated that employee burnout costs U.S. companies $322 billion annually in healthcare and turnover costs alone.

    The Solution

    To effectively combat burnout and enhance employee engagement and well-being, leaders can take several proactive steps. Implementing an organizational Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) can help identify the specific areas where burnout is manifesting. Additionally, leveraging AWL Survey (Areas of Work Life) can provide input for scalable solutions. It helps leaders understand where to target efforts; e.g., workload, autonomy, recognition, community, fairness, and/or values.

    The Bottom Line

    When leaders ignore burnout, they’re not avoiding a problem, they’re quietly signing off on an expensive invisible invoice.

    The companies that thrive in the next decade won’t be the ones with the flashiest perks or the longest hours. They’ll be the ones that recognize burnout as the signal it is, and respond with the same urgency and precision they bring to every other business risk.

    Because when you solve burnout, you don’t just protect your people. You protect your business.

  • The Power Gap: The Hidden Driver of Middle Manager Burnout

    The Power Gap: The Hidden Driver of Middle Manager Burnout

    •

    Christy Suerth, MS, SPHR, CPC, CHC

    I’ve seen it and I’ve experienced it. There’s a quiet, exhausting truth in corporate life. It rarely makes it into senior leadership conversations. People are held accountable for results without having the authority to create them. It causes burnout.

    Middle managers live here:

    • Responsible for ambitious (impossible?) KPIs.
    • Expected to keep teams engaged and productive.
    • Caught between executive vision and frontline practicalities.

    Yet, their ability to make meaningful decisions is often stripped away.

    I call this the Power Gap.

    It’s not just frustrating; it’s one of the most corrosive, and ironically, most preventable, causes of burnout.

    I spent over two decades in multinational corporations leading global Talent Development functions, training countless middle managers. I saw their commitment… their care for their people… their willingness to go the extra mile.

    And I also saw the toll.

    We invested heavily in management training, but the burnout persisted. Why? Because you can’t train away a structural problem.

    The real causes were clear:

    • Workloads that exceeded human capacity.
    • Teams stretched so thin managers became doers instead of leaders.
    • KPIs set without resources to match.
    • Relentless waves of change with no time to recover.

    These are not gaps in skill. They are gaps in design.

    The solutions require courage at the top:
    • Clarify decision rights so managers know where their “yes” and “no” actually count.
    • Balance staffing and workload to match the expectations being set.
    • Protect focus by pacing change instead of piling it on.

    In my experience, many senior leaders will not implement these decisions. They often see the cost of balancing staffing and workload as a hard cost. They view burnout as a soft cost. But, the long-term impact of burnout has significant financial implications.

    • Burnout leads to higher turnover rates, increased absenteeism, and lower productivity. These are real and measurable costs.
    • Investing in balancing staffing and workload is an investment in the organization’s future. It leads to higher employee retention, reduced absenteeism, and improved performance. The ROI from a healthier, more engaged workforce can far outweigh the initial costs.
    • A culture of burnout erodes trust and morale. By addressing the Power Gap, we foster a positive work environment, attracting top talent and ensuring long-term sustainability. Balancing staffing and workload is essential for creating a resilient organization that can adapt to changes and challenges effectively.

    When middle managers have both accountability and authority, with the resources to back it up, they transform. They stop being bottlenecks. They become bridges, connecting strategy to reality, vision to execution, and people to purpose.

    If we want workplaces where people thrive, we have to close the Power Gap. Not by asking managers to “be more resilient,” but by redesigning the very role they’re asked to carry.

    For more information on burnout and its impact, contact me or follow me on LinkedIn.

  • Middle Managers: The Missing Link in Burnout Recovery

    Middle Managers: The Missing Link in Burnout Recovery

    •

    Christy Suerth, MS, SPHR, CPC, CHC

    Johnny C. Taylor, CEO of SHRM, recently offered practical advice for tackling burnout: spot the warning signs, encourage open dialogue, rebalance workloads, clarify expectations, and connect people with supportive resources like EAPs. These are important. But they’re not enough.

    There’s a blind spot in most corporate conversations around burnout and it carries real business consequences.

    We’re not talking nearly enough about middle managers.

    Middle managers are the connective tissue of every organization. They interpret strategy, drive performance, absorb change, and hold space for their teams, all while trying to meet expectations from above. They’re responsible for culture on the ground. And they’re exhausted.

    This layer of leadership is too often invisible in wellbeing strategies. We focus on frontline engagement or executive leadership development. But we forget the people holding both ends together. That’s a mistake.

    Middle managers are burning out – quietly, constantly, and in plain sight. Nearly half of U.S. middle managers now fear being laid off. Many are pushing themselves beyond what’s sustainable. They show up, stay late, skip recovery time, and carry the emotional weight of others because that’s what they think good leadership requires.

    The cost is staggering. A 2025 study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine estimates burnout costs between $4,000 and $21,000 per employee, per year. For a company of 1,000 that’s a $5 million annual loss. And that doesn’t include the ripple effects: higher turnover, lower morale, slower innovation, and culture decay.

    If we’re serious about employee wellbeing, and profitability,  we need to get serious about supporting the people in the middle.

    Let’s stop asking managers to do more with less. Let’s stop normalizing heroic over-functioning. Let’s build something better – intentionally, and with heart.

    Here’s what that could look like:

    • Wellbeing as a KPI – Track manager wellbeing alongside business outcomes. Make it a metric that matters, not a poster on the wall.
    • Confidential Peer Circles- Create trusted spaces where managers can talk, exhale, and learn from each other without fear of judgment.
    • Genuine Recognition and Real Autonomy – Acknowledge not just results, but emotional labor. Give managers more say in how work gets done.
    • Training That Feels Human – Move beyond compliance. Offer workshops that equip managers with real skills: empathy, boundaries, psychological safety.
    • Reverse Mentoring – Invite two-way conversations between managers and executives. Give middle leaders a voice, and help the C-suite listen.
    • Workload Audits – Regularly review what’s on managers’ plates. Make space by removing the non-essential.
    • Protected Recovery Time – Normalize rest. Not as a perk, but as a performance strategy. Model this from the top.
    • Leadership with Heart – When senior leaders speak openly about their own challenges with burnout, they create permission for others to be honest too.

    Here’s the truth: middle managers are holding up the scaffolding of your culture. If they collapse, everything falls.

    So, here’s my invitation: What’s one bold move your organization can make today to support its “missing middle”?

    Because if we want resilient teams and thriving workplaces, we must start by caring for the people in the middle – thoughtfully, tangibly, and without delay.